Getting different minds behind your change

People in organisations make decisions based on a variety of criteria.  These decisions are motivated by a multitude of factors.  So how do you ensure decisions are made when planning and implementing change?  How do you get everyone to agree and on board quickly?

Harvard Business Review (April 2012) reported interesting research on decision-making for data-savvy employees.  The research was carried out with 5,000 employees in 22 global companies.  Three groups or decision-makers emerged:

 

  1. Visceral decision makers – base decisions exclusively on their gut feelings
  2. Informed sceptics   – those who seek out information and exercise caution
  3. Unquestioning empiricists   – trust analysis over judgement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For our purposes, this research shows that different people need different types and levels of information to make decisions.  And arguably the ‘informed sceptics’ are the employees best equipped to make good decisions, given that they balance judgement and analysis.

And yet, many organisations struggle when planning for change because they cannot help people make decisions.  For example, making data available is very important because 80% of employees need data for effective decision-making (as highlighted by the HBR research).  

Our possible solution is to run the Able and How Change Index to generate data.  That data can then inform decisions when planning and implementing change. People are therefore able to make more informed decisions about their approach to change, and the planned changes are more likely to succeed.   

Adding to the likelihood of success in change is all the more important when you consider that currently only about 30% of change programmes reach their objectives.

There are other important ways to address the different needs for information.  Writing a case for change is always a good first step.  The case for change should address the various motivations, from exploring what the change means to your organisation and customers, all the way to the impact on you as an individual.

Accepting that we all process information in different ways and are motivated by multiple factors, getting all those different minds behind your change can be the best path to successful change.

Gamification during times of change

At Able and How we recognise the fact that organisations need employees to adapt to change, especially during times of economic uncertainty.

According to a study by psychiatrists Holmes and Rahe, ‘business readjustment’ can be a more stressful event than the loss of a close friend, or a child leaving home. Making sure that employees are properly engaged during the change is therefore very important.

There are many ways of doing this, but increasingly, organisations are finding more interactive ways to engage with employees. Adding a fun and social element to change efforts is something that we see as being adopted by organisations more and more in 2012.

Enter Gamification

‘Gamification’ is said to be the use of game design techniques, to enhance non-game contexts. The main characteristics of Gamification are:

  • Quick feedback and recognition
  • Ranking users to increase competition

There are obvious benefits to this technique. Quick feedback and recognition for employees working under changing circumstances is generally a good thing. It gives positive reinforcement when people have successfully completed a task, and creates short term wins, which is critical when trying to implement change.

Ranking users and increasing competition also has its benefits. The more recognition employees receive, the more ‘badges’ he or she wins. The more badges received, the higher the rank. The higher the rank, (presumably) other employees will want to join in the ‘game’ and achieve even more short term wins to compete. Essentially, a public ranking system can give social incentives to continue to progress, and in this case, further adapt to change.

However, it can’t all be good news. Gamification also has a few pitfalls which you should be aware of. For the feedback system to be quick, it runs the risk of being too formulaic or one dimensional. For feedback to be effective, it needs to be of good quality, and needs to focus on the relevant areas for each individual. Also, recognition through ‘badges’ or ‘trophies’ needs to be viewed as a means to achieving wider business goals. These are not ends in themselves. The short term wins are just small pieces of a puzzle which make up the overall change program.

Last but by no means least, everyone agrees that there’s nothing wrong with healthy competition. However in times of change, do you really want to display employees on a leaderboard with ‘winners’ and ‘losers’? What does this imply in times of uncertainty? If not done correctly, this part of gamification could even have the opposite effect to the one intended.

All things considered, anything that gets employees to participate actively to change is good. The quick feedback, quick recognition and element of competition, mean that Gamification is one of those techniques that – if designed in a way that takes into consideration the points made above – can be effective.

The perils of Social Media

Social media is a big deal, yeah. Companies are spending more on more on their online presence, finding new ways to engage with customers and build their brand, all through the various social networks we know and love.

Starbucks was recently named as the most socially engaged company in the USA by advertising research firm Phase One, and marketing campaigns such as My Starbucks Idea have been hugely successful. More and more companies are finding innovative ways of using social media to talk to their customers. Take Best Buy for example, in 2009 they pioneered the use of social media for customer services, offering Twitter followers a Best Buy Twelpforce to answer any complaints or questions online, in real time.

Our very own David Ferrabee even made a film about social media, promoting the idea that companies who use it in the right way can create greater employee engagement.

But social media can also be a bad thing.

The most high profile example of this occurred a couple of months ago with the McDonald’s #McDstories. Back in January, McDonalds began a twitter campaign encouraging people to tell their own McDonalds based stories online. They even posted a glossy video of potato supplier Frank Martinez eating a raw potato, accompanying it with the tweet, “when you make something w/pride, people can taste it.” Unfortunately for McDonalds this campaign had the exact opposite effect their marketing folk had desired. Tweeters responded with a series of horror stories about McDonalds, including one user who claimed he was served a fingernail in his Big Mac and another claiming he was hospitalised with food poisoning after eating at the chain. Social Media Director Rick Wion commented that “within an hour, we saw that it wasn’t going as planned.”

In all likelihood this episode will do nothing to burger sales at McDonalds, but it does highlight an important point. When thinking about using social media, either as a marketing tool or as a means of employee engagement, you need to have a robust, well thought out strategy. Jumping in to social media without good advice and a good plan can will only lead to failure. Given all of the possibilities it presents, it seems a shame to get it wrong.

Different approaches to change

During large organisational transformation, we often focus on employee resistance to change. Employees may be tempted to resist change simply because of fear of being exposed to something new that they deem unnecessary or a threat to a tried and trusted way of doing business. There are many tips out there on how to reduce employee resistance to change. Perhaps [...]

Increasing number of women on FTSE 100 Boards

How it helps and what we can do

Diversity is always an issue that causes much discussion, and this week there are interesting findings about the role of women on UK Boards.   According to the law firm Eversheds, the best performing companies are likely to have a smaller Board size and a high proportion of female directors (the study included 241 [...]

Leadership as a key skill for the future

We have all had experiences of good and bad leaders, and know how important their role is.  The fact that leadership skills are important or that one’s line manager is the leader we usually trust the most is nothing new.  But we now have statistics linking effective managers with high performing organisations. 

80% of managers in high-performing organisations are rated effective [...]

Just a small merger…

Two weeks ago it was announced that Anglo-Swiss mining group Xstrata planned to merge with commodities trading giant Glencore International in a deal that would form the seventh biggest firm on the FTSE 100. The deal, valued at $62 billion will create the fourth largest natural resource company in the world, some happy shareholders and a whole lot of upheaval [...]

Executive pay hits the headlines

In the last month, executives have been at the centre of a media storm. In a period of budget cuts and financial crisis, executive pay has been under intense scrutiny. Stephen Hester, the RBS chief executive, and Sly Bailey of Trinity Mirror, are only the latest in a long line of executives who have had to explain or even reject [...]

Austerity and Employee Engagement

Bleak. That’s been the outlook of late. Public sector strikes, higher living costs, a never ending retirement age and general economic apocalypse have been the big news stories for what feels like forever now. We are living through thrifty times, and what was made abundantly clear in George Osborne’s Autumn statement last week (apart from the fact the government will [...]

When a star is not a star

Icons have international recognition. But they also have cultural bias.

Able and How is gearing up for international client work next week. And the office has been discussing how icons have a number of appealing similarities around the world. There are for example natural colours that are associated with apples: red, green or even yellow; and red and orange for fire.

Colour [...]